Hurry up and file

By | Business Immigration, CIS, Citizenship and Naturalization | No Comments

Dear Client,

This is a letter addressed to you, and all it contains is my opinion. So please read this like you do an opinion piece in a newspaper. However, I have been practicing business immigration law for the past 24 years, and this opinion is based on things I have perceived over the years.

On 10/16/2020 the Citizenship and Immigration Service announced that effective immediately the filing fee for Premium Processing would be increased from $1440 to $2500/- The fee was increased from $1225 to $1440. In October 2019 the Citizenship and Immigration Service raised that fee from $1410 to $1440/- When Premium was introduced in 2010, the fee was $1225/- Venture to guess what the next increase would be?

The reason for this increase is that apparently Citizenship and Immigration Service is short of money. Citizenship and Immigration Service does not receive US funding and it is entirely funded by the filing fees. It had worked so far. Why then, all of a sudden are they short of money? The answer lies in the fact that fed up with arbitrary denials and blatant disregard of the law, lawyers have taken to sue the Citizenship and Immigration Service. When we file lawsuits, Citizenship and Immigration Service does not receive any fees. They have to defend themselves with their own money.

Folks who know me, know that I only advocate for Premium filing if the employee needs to go outside US urgently during the pendency of their case. I spend time talking clients out of Premium, some listen, some don’t. This stems for the desire to end the anxiety of waiting to get the result. I do feel for you. But this is what happens on both ends of the spectrum when you want to do a rush filing.

In our law firm we always strive to do the very best job we possibly can. In an ideal world we would work fast and do the same job. But we live in the human world. Sometimes it is simply not possible to do our best job fast. But when you pressure us, we do the best job we can under pressure.

Similarly let’s view this from the Citizenship and Immigration Service Officer’s perspective. When you file Premium, the officers are also rushed. So, they flip through the petition and hit the pre-made Request for Evidence button. And then, once it is answered, you get an approval, depending on the officer’s mood or quota or experience. The more experienced officers tend to make rational decisions.

Now let’s explore the history of Computer Consulting Company’s H-1B immigration petition. Since about 2007 Citizenship and Immigration Service had conducted fraud investigations on Computer Consulting company and there is no doubt that fraud is rampant in that industry. In an attempt to control the fraud, the bright minds at Citizenship and Immigration Service instituted the control memo in 2010. When that failed they harped upon Specialized Knowledge. When tRump came to power, he espoused that H-1B employees need to be the most highly paid employees. This was also struck down by the court. All this led to inconsistent adjudication resulting in decisions all over the place. Lots of petitioners sued and the court consolidated a bunch of those cases in the IT Serve case. That case took away the whole specialized knowledge and control issues.

The Citizenship and Immigration Service is thus looking for ways to deny these cases. Their most recent attempt is to deny those individuals whose underlying degree is not in computer science, never mind that the law states otherwise. I am copying and pasting the law:

“For purposes of determining equivalency to a baccalaureate degree in the specialty, three years of specialized training and/or work experience must be demonstrated for each year of college-level training the alien lacks. For equivalence to an advanced (or Masters) degree, the alien must have a baccalaureate degree followed by at least five years of experience in the specialty.”

There will be more lawsuits, which would not have happened if Citizenship and Immigration Service had only followed the law. But generally, less experienced officers in Premium tend to make hasty negative decisions. And within Citizenship and Immigration Service there are no consequences for the officer, even if the decision gets overturned by a court of law, and Citizenship and Immigration Service wastes money defending these illegal decisions. There are other proposals on the books, like getting the Labor Condition Application signed by both employer and end clients. I don’t want to discuss these proposals until they are passed.

And now let’s get to the real cause of writing this letter. You, my dear client is worried, and justifiably so. I would be too, if this was my case. And I know its extremely hard to work when your status in this country is nagging you.

I hear you.  Like many of you, I grew up in India and it was not until my daughter became a psychiatrist that she diagnosed that I have what is called in this country, “anxiety disorder.” She prescribed medicine and it has helped me tremendously. By no means am I belittling your anxiety. All I am saying is that paying $2500/- to get a swift denial is not prudent.

Trump Proclamation re Visas 06/22/2020

By | Uncategorized | No Comments

Dear Clients,

If Shakespeare had to describe the Presidential Proclamation on Work visas of June 22, 2020, he would say—-the proclamation is “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”
tRump is NOT God or the King. tRump does not have the power to stop H-1B or L-1 or J-1. That needs to be done by the Congress. What this proclamation says is:
1. Folks seeking entry—ie they are now outside the US—
AND
2. who does not have, as yet, a valid H-1B, H-2B, L or certain types of J-(teacher, summer jobs, au pair, etc) Visas—
CANNOT ENTER the US until December 31, 2020.
This does not affect anyone already in the US.
This does not affect anyone outside the US who already have said visa.
This do not affect the adjudication of NEW H-1Bs by Citizenship and Immigration Service for those folks NOT in the US.
It simply relates to entry into the US.
Now, you folks know there is this thing going on world wide —called Covid 19, which is impacting travel anyways. Can you even get interviews with the consulates with covid going on?
The proclamation correctly states that 17 million US jobs have been lost. And that is true. But employers who do not have jobs are not even filing for these visas. Many new H-1B registration are being wasted. When the economy does not do well, the number of visa filings goes down. This happened in all economic crisis, including recently in 2007-2010
Also, Americans either do not have the qualifications of an H-1B, or would rather collect unemployment than do back breaking H-2B jobs.
What this proclamation did well was please the tRump base and created unnecessary fear among the immigrant population.




The Supreme Court DACA decision

By | Uncategorized | No Comments


Dept of Homeland Security V. Regents of U of Cal

First and foremost: I practice very little DACA cases, and those that I do are for folks I know. So I do not make money with these cases and have no financial interest in this. My interest is based merely on rationality and humanitarian reasons. The good thing about this case is that every Justice concurred in part.
1. What is DACA?
The Obama Administration in 2012 created a Memorandum that said that for certain individuals, the Government will withhold deportation. Those individuals, commonly referred to as Dreamers has to:
2. Have entered the US before 2010 as a child
3. Have a squeaky clean background—ie no arrests whatsoever
4. Have a US High School degree or higher
These folks can additionally work in the US, pay taxes and thereby get Social Security and Medicare.
They cannot vote. DACA does not give them any status. The Government will just not deport them

2. Case History
1. During the later years of the Obama Administration, the Congress and Senate became Republican and decided not to pass any significant legislation. They put up every hurdle on the book to block the administration. In desperation, Obama issued administrative Memo, known as DACA.
2. The Obama Administration further issued another memorandum giving similar rights to parents of the DACA individual, called DAPA
3. State of Texas brought a suit against the Obama administration stating that the Obama administration is legislating from the executive branch and the memorandum should be rescinded. The 8 Judge Supreme Court(because the Senate refused to hear the confirmation of Merrick Garland, thereby leaving the ninth seat vacant for 18 months) voted 4/4. So the 5th C ruling was allowed to stand. This would not have happened had Mr. Garland been given the opportunity to become the new Justice.
4. When the present administration came into office, then Attorney General Jeff Sessions wrote to then head of DHS, Ms. Duke to rescind DACA based on DAPA ruling of the 5th C, which she proceeded to do.
5. Several entities filed lawsuit against this decision.

3-Ruling
• The Courts do not have the jurisdiction, under Separation of Powers to adjudicate how the administration conducts itself. Court review is only limited to “the grounds that the agency invoked when it took the action.” The current administration did not have any grounds or reason to rescind DACA, other than that of saying since DAPA is not enforced lets also rescind DACA.

• The current administration did not follow the Administration Procedures Act (APA) to rescind DACA. The APA requires the Administration to make a “reasoned decision” The Obama DACA Memorandum established a “clear and efficient process” for identifying individuals who met the criteria. The current administration can form NEW Memorandum, but cannot rescind Obama Memorandum without expounding on it.

Hopefully the November elections will see a change in the legislature and Administrative unit and can make DACA into law.
Until then, the present administration can create a separate memorandum, DACA will stay. I dont think this Administration will create a new Memorandum stating that Dreamers cannot work before the elections. But there is no knowing what this administration will do. If Joe Biden comes in, he can then reinstitute

On a lighter note, if the present administration wants to create a memorandum to satisfy its base, then I propose they call this memo HATE: Halt All Taco Enablers





IT Serve Alliance vs Cissna

By | Uncategorized | No Comments

We all knew that Citizenship and Immigration Service was acting in an arbitrary and capricious manner in adjudicating H-1B cases. What we needed was a case and a Judge to tell them so. IT Serve Alliance vs. Cissna (hereinafter IT Serve) is that case.
Before we get into the case, let’s get the politics out of the way. This problem with IT consulting companies was happening from 2010—with the Neufeld memo on control. This was in response to a huge number of fraudulent cases being filed by computer consulting companies. This case does not give IT Consulting Companies a carte blanche to file whatever they want. The employee still needs to qualify in a IT related specialty, although now, I do think that an Engineering Degree in certain specialties might qualify—-depending on the degree’s nexus to IT. I still don’t think, for instance, a degree in chemical engineering will suffice for just an IT consultant.
Procedurally, the case is a combination of 30 cases. We will not deal with other procedural matters discussed in this case since it has no bearing on Employers or Employees. This blog is written to help H-1B petitioners and beneficiaries.
Jurisdiction:
This case came from the DC Circuit Court. Since Citizenship and Immigration Service is headquartered in DC, all offices of Citizenship and Immigration Service is bound by this decision. That stuff is for lawyers, and I can tell you its great for us. It takes away the way Citizenship and Immigration Service handled matters as a supreme dictator.

ISSUES
CONTROL:

We do not require the utterly stupid control letters up the chain to the end client. The court upheld the 1991 regulation which states that the employer must show the
1. The ability to hire, OR
2. Ability to fire, OR
3. To pay, OR
4. To Supervise, Or
5. To Control.

The Court noted that OR does not mean AND. Therefore some document showing the ability to do any one of the following will suffice. For a new or transfer, I think just an offer letter and acceptance will be enough. So say Adios to the 2010 Nuefeld Control Memo.

Specialized Knowledge:

The court held that Specialty occupation, as defined in 8 USC § 1184.1 is
Specialty Occupation is an OCCUPATION that requires theoretical and practical application of a highly specialized body of knowledge in the fields of human endeavor.
Therefore it is NOT the Job Description, not the JOB, but the OCCUPATION. The Court says, “Specialized Occupation would likely encompass a host of jobs, from trainee to expert, along with expert along with concomitant but different personal job duties.

As you know, there are four prongs for Specialty Occupation:
1. Baccalaureate of higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position,
2. Requirement of such Degree is Common in the Industry
3. Employer Normally Requires a Bachelor’s Degree or equivalent in a related field OR
4. Job is Complex
This would take away the inane percentage of time that we would put into our job description.
The Court also did away with Defensor v. Meissner in a single footnote, (FN 13) so we would NOT require any bullshit from end client

ITINERARY
An Itinerary is not required. The court basically told the Citizenship and Immigration Service to give the required three years. The court says that benching employees is OK, as long as the employer continues to pay for that employee.
H-1B regulations do not address furlough. Therefore one can argue that the State Employment Law controls.
WHAT IT SERVE DOES NOT ADDRESS:

1 IT Serve does not address “Material Change” for Amendment, so Simieo is still good law. One have to file an amendment, but in doing so, would require less burden of proof
2 IT Serve does not address why some SOC Codes are better than others—-ie why Systems Analyst is suddenly not a specialized SOC. However a lawsuit will be filed regarding this issue, so stay tuned for future development

We will change our petitions to reflect this case. The Citizenship and Immigration Service should have new memos after this case, but I doubt that will happen under this administration, or until Steven Miller loses control.

Visitor’s Visa Extension due to CoronaVid

By | Uncategorized | No Comments

Travelers enter the United States for visits either through a visitor’s visa or under a Visa Waiver Treaty (also known as ESTA, since they have to register online before travelling). In either case, everyone got stuck (Stung? ) by Covid and travel restrictions beyond their visa’s allotted time. What does this do to their status?
Here is my perspective:
Timing:
CoronaVid, travel advisory and airplane schedules are changing every day. So I would wait until closer to the the visa expiry date.
The Law:
B-1 visitors are advised to file an extension on form I-539
VWP and Satisfactory Departure: According to 8CFR § 217.3 9 9 (a) “If an emergency prevents an alien admitted under this part from departing from the United States within his or her period of authorized stay, the district director having jurisdiction over the place of the alien’s temporary stay may, in his or her discretion, grant a period of satisfactory departure not to exceed 30 days. If departure is accomplished during that period, the alien is to be regarded as having satisfactorily accomplished the visit without overstaying the allotted time.”

Many Field Offices and CBP offices are stamping the passport for 30 days extension.

Problems with the Law:

Obviously the law did not anticipate the Covid pandemic. The extension of B-1 visa via I-539 form is expensive and takes forever for the Government to decide. There is a chance, however unlikely at this stage, of a denial, impacting future travel. Note: File online, Citizenship and Immigration Service is relaxing those blue ink signature requirements

Satisfactory Departure is good for 30 days only and making an infopass appointment is very hard.

We have been hearing that Citizenship and Immigration Service might grant status without any filing until this crisis is over. We have not heard anything from Citizenship and Immigration Service yet

CoVid Updates

By | Uncategorized | No Comments

Here are the recent updates for Covid:
1 The USCIS has suspended all interviews and naturalization ceremonies until at least April 1
2. USCIS has suspended Premium Processing
3. USCIS WILL accept scanned signatures and is not mandating “actual” ink signatures.

New H-1B registration

By | Uncategorized | No Comments

1. Is the Citizenship and Immigration Service going to have the lottery first before submitting H-1B application?

Citizenship and Immigration Service said that New (FY 2021) H-1B registration will be available from March 1 to March 20, 2020. From what we understand, these dates are etched in stone, ie Employers will not be able to add, subtract or modify anyone/anything after March 20, 2020. (Note: this deadline is before the March 31-April 1st deadline in previous years).

2. Where will the registration be held?

Registration will be on an online portal on USCIS.gov. We are already registered and can register your employees.
Current Citizenship and Immigration Service fees is $10/- per employee-Only Employers can pay this fee

3. What information do you need:

If you are my client, I already have employer information. However, employer information required by Citizenship and Immigration Services includes:

Employer Information:

1. Legal name of the prospective petitioning company or organization
2. Doing Business As
3. Employer identification number (EIN) of the prospective petitioning company or organization
4. Primary U.S. office address of a prospective petitioning company or organization
5. Legal name, title, and contact information (daytime phone number and email address) of the authorized signatory

Employee Information:

1. Legal Name
2. gender
3. Does the Employee have a master’s or higher degree from a U.S. institution of higher education? If so, what institution, what subject
4. date of birth
5. country of birth
6. country of citizenship
7. passport number
Please note though that we will also need the following information:
Job Title:
Job Location:
For third party vendors: Job duration
Employee’s educational documents

4 Why do we need this additional information?

1. We want to pre screen individuals
2. The registrant (us) has to certify that we are aware that all information is true and correct
3. The Citizenship and Immigration Service might sanction employers for filing frivolous (ie candidates who do not qualify or jobs don’t exist) registration
4. Having practiced Immigration law for 25 years, we have dealt with many instances of Citizenship and Immigration Service going back on promises. If its March 10th, and the Citizenship and Immigration Service website is still malfunctioning, that might be a problem. Therefore, ideally we would like to file the Labor Condition Application. If Citizenship and Immigration Service says they will not conduct the lottery this year, we will be ready with an approved Labor Condition Application.

Moreover, we think the Citizenship and Immigration Service will allow us to include the Labor Condition Application during registration, along with our G-28.

5 What time is good to start the process?

We strongly suggest you let us know the information by February, so that we can be well prepared on March 1st.

6 When will the registration be held?
Citizenship and Immigration Service says it “intends” to notify registrants of the lottery results by March 31, 2020. So the lottery will probably be held between March 21 and March 31.

Issues for Foreign Students

By | Uncategorized | No Comments

Today is 09/11/2019—-18 years from that fatal day when students crashed their planes into the Wall Street Center. This blog will deal with issues that now occurs, under the Trump administration. In context I would like to point out that Trump Administration under the guidance of Stephen Miller is actually pursuing a policy of hatred rather than one of rationality and thus many of these issues have no logic behind them.
The number of students coming to the US has dropped precipitously and there are denials galore, way more than denials during the 09/11 days. This blog explores the general state of Student Visas issues. Note: Students from China and the Middle East face increased scrutiny. Also F-2 spouse and child are denied visas if the consulate believe that they will work illegally. This creates additional hardships on students.
There are some MUST do caveats for STUDENTS on F-1 visas. They are:
1. Check with the DSO and keep your Sevis alive at all times, including during the OPT stage and until you get the H-1B visa.
2. If your F visa is taking long, check with the DSO and ask them to defer admission if visa is not obtained on time. This might be a problem especially for graduate studies where semester begins in the fall only. But keep Sevis alive no matter the cost.
3. After you get the visa, please take actual courses, FULL TIME in the campus. Please go to class.
4. Take out health insurance. If you have any health concerns or you have a baby on taxpayer’s money you will have a problem with Adjustment of Status later
5. Do NOT get into any criminal activities, including drugs. Do NOT drink and drive.
6. Do not accept side cash business, like driving uber, or working for anything with cash. You may however continue to do any internet based business you might have in your home country and get paid in your home country.
7. Do not post any political messages on social media. This will not prohibit you from getting a visa, but it might delay the application in an atmosphere where most applications are delayed or denied

Common reasons for Students to lose F status:
• Dropping below full load
• Dropping out of school
• Working without authorization
• Transferring without proper sevis requirement
• Unemployment or inappropriate work on CPT or OPT

Converting to Student Visa from Visitor’s Visa—–This is not advisable anymore.
• First you have to stay for 90 days before you can apply;
• Second they have an extremely high rate of denial.
• And third, if you ever go out of the country for any reason the consulates are not giving visas anymore. So you are virtually imprisoned here in the US.

For OPT:
• For Stem OPT—-Please note that the I-983 needs to have a detailed plan. Contact your DSO every six months. Note that there are site visits to your place of employment these days, so have the employer go through the plan and implement it
• DO NOT travel on CAP GAP

For CPT
CPT is not very well regulated now, but regulations are coming in. CPT creates a lot of problems for any future benefits including H-1B and potentially Adjustment of Status
• Students need to attend school physically.
• If CPT optional it Work HAS to be for credit. If required—has to be required for ALL students
• Work has to have academic oversight
• The CPT work has to be directly related to their major and integral to the program of study. This is problematic especially with business administration—where a person can work in the field of Software or Engineering this can prove extremely difficult to justify. Foir a general MBA-unless you work for a Business Consulting Company that does business related work only, you will be denied a subsequent H-1B. However, if the course you are studying has to do with ONLY Software business Admin (like MIS) or Engineering Business, only then can you work with a software or Engineering Company. But these industries will NOT work for a general business degree.
• CPT has to be on a higher level than their last degree. If you have a Master’s, the CPT generally needs to be a PhD
• CPT will be different for each school.
• Be especially careful of Day one CPT. These will most probably not allow you to maintain status

For more information visit Banerjee&Associates

CIS’s Delays and Denials

By | Business Immigration, CIS, Citizenship and Naturalization, Employer/Employee, H1-B, Houston Immigration, Immigration, Immigration Policy, Uncategorized | No Comments

I am sure that most of you know by now the inordinate processing delays and Request for Evidences in almost every case, no matter what evidence we give the CIS initially. Citizenship and Immigration Service has distanced themselves from us Immigration Attorneys, and is no longer talking to American Immigration Lawyer’s Association. It has also changed its infopass system, so members of the public cannot go and ask questions.
The other thing that Citizenship and Immigration Service is doing is arbitrary denials. There is no uniformity or accountability and each officer is left to deny cases as they please.
These delays and arbitrary denials are causing needless hardship for Immigrants.
The Administrative Appeals Office, which is supposed to be a non partisan agency, who is supposed to be reviewing the case like new (ie without Citizenship and Immigration Service’s interpretation) has now rubber stamped the agency’s decision 100% of the time for the past 2.5 years.
So our ONLY remedy is to go to federal courts. Mandamus the Citizenship and Immigration Service to act, or appeal to federal courts for Citizenship and Immigration Service’s arbitrary decisions. But those of us who live in red states would probably not get a fair trial, unless we file in DC, who has jurisdiction, because that is where Citizenship and Immigration Service is located. That is of course an added time and travel expense. Especially Business Immigration, because private companies don’t work at the speed of Government.
The Citizenship and Immigration Service had always given the excuse that the delay was due to the number of petitions filed. Yet, when they published their report, it showed that there was a 13% reduction of applications filed. Simultaneously, the processing times increased by 8%.
With this knowledge in hand, the American Immigration Lawyer’s Association testified to the Congressional Immigration Committee on July 16, 2019. This is a bi partisan committee. Sharvari Dalal-Dheini, AILA Director of Government Relations, noted, “It is not hyperbole to say that the consequences of these delays are dire. In recent months, dozens of Republican and Democratic leaders in the House and Senate have demanded that USCIS address what are unacceptable low performance measures. We greatly appreciate the work the Committee is now doing to hold the agency accountable for its failure to administer immigration benefits, as Congress mandated. AILA’s more than 15,000 members have been urging USCIS to address these delays for years, only to see them worsen. Today’s hearing is vitally important, but Congress should also pass legislation to ensure greater transparency and accountability within USCIS going forward. These failures harm our economy, American businesses, families and communities. America deserves a strong, effective legal immigration system to keep businesses competitive and our families and communities prospering.”
Yesterday Forbes reported that Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) asked the Citizenship and Immigration Service about the delays and denials. USCIS Associate Director for Service Center Operations Donald Neufeld said, “I can tell you that a number of changes have been made affecting H-1B processing over the last couple of years”—-thereby admitting that changes made were a result of this administration.
I do not know if anything will change under this administration. I know I have been slower to respond to clients. But it is virtually impossible to get back to everyone at the rate we used to in 2015, because we now live in a world where Immigrants are told to go back to where they came from, even at the very top of our administration and useless Request for Evidences are the rule rather than the exception of the day. We know you are anxious. We are too. But rest assured we will fight for you as best as we can.

Fire and ICE

By | Uncategorized | No Comments

In 1985 my husband was a Medical Resident at Harvard. In 1992, we became permanent residents of the United States. I went to law school in 92, and became a lawyer. We both worked and paid taxes. We raised two children who went to Ivy Leagues and both are now MDs (A radiologist and a Psychiatrists). They will begin to pay taxes while my husband and I near retirement age. Net gain for US—substantial. My husband was a doctor. And we need doctors. But we also need Construction workers, maids, gardeners, fruit pickers, chicken pluckers. But unlike a degree in Medicine, there are no visa categories for these jobs.

                                                           Laws
There are three main ways to Immigrate to the US. They are through: Business Sponsorship, Family Sponsorship and Asylum. Business Immigration, which I have been practicing for the past 20 plus years confines itself to highly educated or high net worth individuals. And no question, America needs them. But we also need folks to clean houses, mow our lawns, etc. These are not temporary jobs, yet they are useful jobs. However the only category available right now is for temporary workers which are seasonal—-like fruit pickers or summertime restaurant workers. These visas are not for long term. My house cleaners have been working for me since 1997. It bothers me that I cannot sponsor them, because there is no Business Immigration laws for that category. Family sponsorship is limited to only immediate family for Permanent Residency Holders or Citizens.
That leaves Asylum as the ONLY option for the folks in the Southern Borders. The Asylum law states that the Alien has to prove that: “alien’s life or freedom would be threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion” This fear has to be credible, and supported by evidence. A vague fear that “our country is lawless, and gangs could kill me” is not enough. This is extremely hard to prove. Even if the alien is personally threatened, provable evidence is not there in most cases.

                                                                Facts
According to NPR, refugees have to pay eight thousand USD per person to come to US.  Attorney’s charge 5-8K. So there is quite a bit of expense involved. And folks who can come up with that kind of money generally do not have credible fear, because they can bribe the “bad guys.” They are mostly coming for the same reason every immigrant comes to the US—to get a better life for themselves and their families. They work very hard. They construct our houses, clean them and add value to our economy. But again, we do not have the laws for this kind of business sponsorship.

                                                           Trump
Comes now Trump a bigot, a racist and an idiot. He doles out everything with a dollop of hate. When he met with this situation, instead of diffusing the situation, he resorted to hateful tweets. What resulted was the press sensationalizing the situation, more migrants coming in on fear that US will close the doors, and scant resources. They were being housed in terrible, heartbreaking conditions. Since these folks endured so much, they would be ideal workers, able and more than willing. We need these migrants.


                                                       ICE vs CONGRESS
ICE stands for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. It is their JOB to enforce the Immigration laws. But as we already established, the law is simply not there. Yet Congresswomen like Ocasio Cortez chose to criticize ICE. Yes, Trump is a racist. Despite his tweets, Trump does NOT control day to day operations of ICE. ICE is an Organization and by far they follow rules laid out by administrative decisions. The recent conditions in the border was caused by an upsurge on the amount of refugees coming in, and the facility being inadequate. To solve the problem we needed funding. And funding is provided not by the Executive, but by the legislature.
Additionally laws are made by the Congress—-not by the executive. But just like Trump, AOC will scream, and not actually do anything.


                                            Solution vs Politics
We know that the Congress is divided. However, if the House creates employment-based categories, the Senate will most likely accept them. What the senate (with majority Republican) will not accept is a “path to citizenship.” On the other hand, Democrats will not do anything unless these migrants are given a path to citizenship, aka votes. Both parties are using migrants as pawns for their agenda.
My solution is: Forget Politics. Come together and sign employment based categories for all jobs. We need help with jobs like Maids, Gardeners, Home Health Care, Construction, etc. We baby boomers NEED that help, and we can pay for this help. Give them temporary work permits renewable if they are still employed. And then, if they can show employment for X number of years, such that their connection to their home country is dwindling, then let them apply for Green Card-Permanent Residency, and then 5 years from that time, apply for Citizenship. Democrats, by then the millennials will control, and if the Republican Party does not change, they will cease to exist.